Context:
JLB 549, 12/19/1885: "It occurs to me now that one could get very much better colours if one worked with studies painted directly from life from the photographs that people want to see painted"
Context:
BVG 441, 12/19/1885: "Now it seems to me that one could get a much better colouring if one worked from studies painted directly from life on the photographs which one wants to have painted."
JLB 549, 12/19/1885: "It occurs to me now that one could get very much better colours if one worked with studies painted directly from life from the photographs that people want to see painted."
Context:
BVG 441, 12/19/1885l: "There seems to be a lot of beautiful women in this city, and I feel sure that money is to be earned by painting women's portraits or fantasy heads and figures of women."
JLB 549, 12/19/1885: "There seem to be a lot of beautiful women in this city, and it has to be the case that there's money to be earned with either women's portraits or imaginary women -- heads and figures."
Context:
JLB 549, 12/19/1885: "The prices -- the public -- everything needs renewing. And the future is working cheaply for the bourgeoisie, perhaps. At any rate -- the ordinary art lovers themselves seem to be getting more and more set, becoming hard."
The last part of this sweeping indictment may betray Vincent's real agenda. He wants to use the dealers' negative attitude about the marketplace (i.e., about the salability of Vincent's art) as an excuse to stop visiting dealers ("scratching about") altogether, thus relieving himself of the duty to sell his own work -- a promise he made repeatedly to Theo before coming to Antwerp -- and the unpleasantness of hearing criticisms of his work.
Context:
JLB 544, 11/26/1885: "I'm afraid that the trade is categorically as quiet as the grave."
Context:
BVG 440, 12/15/1885: "If there were more better things on view, more business would be done."
Context:
JLB 549, 12/19/1885: "The prices -- the public -- everything needs renewing."
Context:
BVG 441, 12/19/1885: "Goodbye, but try to write me by return mail, for I am feeling rather faint, as I have somewhat overstrained myself with one thing and another, and I need my strength."
JLB 549, 12/19/1885: "Regards -- but see that you write to me by return, for I have a faint sensation in my body because I've exerted myself rather a lot on this and that, and I need my strength."
Context:
BVG 445, 1/17/1886-1/20/1886: "It is very cold here, and most of the time I feel far from well, but as long as the painting flourishes, it doesn't matter so much."
JLB 553, 1/19/1886-1/20/1886: "It's dreadfully cold here, and I often feel far from well, but anyway, as long as the painting's going, that doesn't really matter."
Context:
JLB 553, 1/19/1886-1/20/1886: "It's dreadfully cold here, and I often feel far from well."
Context:
JLB 550, 12/28/1885: "I notice that my appetite has been kept in check for rather too long and that when I received the money from you I couldn't stomach any food."
Context:
JLB 558, 2/4/1886: "I think that getting the teeth attended to will help in itself because, as my mouth was usually painful, I just swallowed my food as quickly as possible."
Context:
JLB 557, 2/2/1886: "It was the last month that I've had a lot of trouble with it -- I also started to cough all the time, bring up phlegm &c., so that I became worried."
Context:
JLB 552, 1/12/1886-1/16/1886: "At the moment I'm losing weight, and moreover my clothes are getting too bad &c. You know very well yourself that this won't do. All the same, I have a degree of confidence that we can pull through."
The single most persuasive piece of evidence is direct. It was developed by Tralbaut and subsequently verified by Wilkie. In a small sketchbook from Antwerp, Tralbaut recognized a notation Vincent had made ("A Cavenaile, Rue de Hollande, 2 consultations: 8 à 9, 11½ à 3") as a reference to a doctor named Hubertus Amadeus Cavenaille, who established himself in Antwerp in 1883 and was 44 years old in 1885 (Tralbaut, p. 177). Tralbaut interviewed Cavenaille's grandson, also a doctor, who remembered that his grandfather had claimed to have treated the painter and "sometimes discussed [Vincent] in the family" (ibid., p. 178). According to Tralbaut, "Dr. Cavenaille [the grandfather] clearly remembered the 'queer dauber' in disreputable clothes who told him straight off that he had no money" (ibid.). According to the grandson, Dr. Cavenaille also "made no secret of the fact that he had treated Vincent for syphilis, and this explains the nature of the prescriptions" (ibid.). Wilkie followed up with the same witness and secured confirmation of Tralbaut's account: "Did your grandfather tell you what he treated Van Gogh for?" Wilkie asked the grandson, Dr. Amadeus Cavenaille. "Yes," Cavenaille replied. "He said he treated Van Gogh for syphilis. He prescribed a treatment with mercury and sent him to the Stuyvenberg hospital for hip-baths" (Wilkie, pp. 143-144).
If the subject of this reputable and unbroken chain of hearsay had been less inflammatory, it surely would have been accepted into the biographical canon long ago. Resistance from the Van Gogh family, especially Vincent Willem van Gogh, Vincent's nephew and Theo's son, may have been responsible for the quarantining of this and other unflattering aspects of Vincent's biography for so long. Although Vincent Willem did contribute a laudatory preface to the 1969 work by Tralbaut that first broached the subject of Vincent's syphilis, Wilkie reports that, behind the scenes, he was infuriated by the breach (ibid., p. 146). Wilkie himself, by his account, encountered bitter hostility when he attempted to interview Vincent Willem on the subject of Vincent's and Theo's syphilis (ibid., pp. 150-151). This probably had more to do with the implications of the finding for Vincent Willem's father, Theo; the nature of Theo's death (it was later confirmed that he died from the effects of tertiary syphilis); and the unflattering light both threw on the relationship between Vincent Willem's parents. This long and hidden controversy over the revelation of Vincent's (and Theo's) diagnoses of syphilis is relevant to the current discussion in that it illustrates the shame associated with the disease among "decent" people in Vincent's and Theo's class, even a hundred years later; and helps explain the lengths Vincent went to at this time (in Antwerp) to conceal his condition even from his brother.
For that reason, much of the evidence for the diagnosis is circumstantial: (1) While Vincent never explicitly reported syphilis's signature affliction, cankers, he did report the major consequences of oral cankers: mouth pain and difficulty chewing and swallowing. (2) Although he never admitted to mercury treatments, he complained repeatedly about the primary side-effects of mercury treatments administered orally (i.e., salivation and gastrointestinal problems), and later suffered gruesomely from another known side-effect of mercury treatment: tooth loss. (3) The "bain de siège" that he noted in his sketchbook next to Cavenaille's name (see Ch. 26, n. 266) could have referred to the "fumigations" that were commonly used at the time to treat syphilis (see Ch. 26, n. 268). These were conducted while the patient sat covered in blankets. (4) Another of Vincent's jotted notes "alum 20c pinte ou ½ temps à autre" (alum 20c pint or ½ from time to time) could refer to the use of alum as an astringent or styptic -- a (painful) treatment for open sores. (Given Vincent's stomach troubles, it is unlikely that it was prescribed as an emetic, its other common use in medicine at the time.) (5) The "castor oil" Vincent noted could have been prescribed as an ameliorative for his chronic stomach upset -- another side-effect of mercury treatment. (6) According to Wilkie, Dr. Cavenaille's grandson specifically recalled that his grandfather prescribed mercury for Vincent's affliction (ibid., pp. 146-147). (7) After he moved to Arles in 1888, Vincent revealed that he (along with Theo) had received treatments of "iodide of potassium" while living in Paris after leaving Antwerp (JLB 611, 5/20/1888). As discussed in Ch. 26, n. 264, iodide of potassium was commonly used to treat syphilis in its later stages, when mercury was considered less effective. (According to Wilkie's research, it was not used to treat gonorrhea [Wilkie, p. 153].) Setting aside the implications for Theo's health (see Chapter 26), the fact that Vincent received iodide of potassium treatments in Paris strongly suggests that he had been diagnosed and treated for "primary" syphilis by the time he arrived there. (The classic three-stage progression of the disease had not yet been articulated.) (8) The fact that Vincent did not mention the sitz-baths, the castor oil, the alum, the Stuyvenberg hospital, or Dr. Cavenaille in his letters to Theo suggests that the condition for which he was being treated carried a significant burden of shame.
Theo was well aware of his brother's bout of gonorrhea in The Hague so there would have been no reason to hide a recurrence from him. Which is not to say that Vincent was able to completely conceal his afflictions from Theo. The letters from Antwerp are, in our opinion, fraught with hints or "slips" that reveal Vincent's private torment. (1) He complained about the "indifference" and "apathy" of Antwerp dealers, "particularly since this disease is contagious" (JLB 550, 12/28/1885). (2) Speaking unsympathetically of Rubens's "weeping Magdalen or Mater Dolorosas," he wrote that they "remind me of the tears of a pretty tart who's caught the clap" (JLB 552, 1/12/1886-1/16/1886). (3) In discussing the effects of his stomach problems on his teeth, he wrote, "I thought that my teeth were bad for another reason," but he never says what that reason was (JLB 557, 2/2/1886). (4) In "explaining" his sickness, he reminded Theo, "You understand that I'm no better than the next man," and warned that if he neglects himself "just like so many other painters (SO MANY if one looks into it) -- I would drop dead or, worse still, become mad or slow-witted" (ibid.; emphasis in original). This dire prognosis (insanity or death) bears no relationship at all to the symptoms or treatments Vincent has admitted to. It is, however, where syphilis was thought to lead (and, in Theo's case at least, did lead). (5) Similarly, Vincent later described his condition as "a ruin" and reported that his unnamed doctor prescribed a "better way of life" (JLB 562, 2/14/1886). At the time, these terms, especially "hygienic," almost invariably signaled sexual afflictions.
Finally, it is almost statistically certain that Vincent was exposed to syphilis either during his time in Nuenen or in Antwerp. Not only did he see prostitutes regularly in Eindhoven, but he almost certainly visited them on his rare visits to Utrecht, Amsterdam, and Antwerp before he moved to the latter city in late 1885. This was an era in which syphilis was rampant within the prostitute population -- so much so that prostitution and syphilis were widely seen as inseparable problems. (See Corbin; and Harsin, pp. 250-260.) Rates of infection were especially high in port cities like Antwerp and they spiked when major events brought foreigners and provincials (both clients and prostitutes) to town (Corbin, p. 248). Antwerp had hosted a World Exhibition in 1885, just months before Vincent's arrival. For cosmopolitan cities like Paris, the rate of syphilis infection among all adult males was estimated at fifteen percent or more (Micale, p. 202). Given Vincent's obsessive emersion in Antwerp's prostitute population, it is virtually inconceivable that he did not contract the disease there, assuming that he had not already contracted it by the time he arrived.
Quétel, pp. 83-84: In the eighteenth century, "there was virtual unanimity in favour of mercury, which was considered to be the only specific remedy for the pox." The nineteenth century added iodides to the armamentarium, but "the star of the pharmacopeia," according to Crissey and Parish, continued to be mercury (Crissey and Parish, p. 360). The only disagreements among experts related to the dosage: "The question of optimum dose and timing led to an incredible amount of bickering in print. Short and intensive courses of treatment, moderate doses intermittently given, protracted courses with smaller amounts -- each permutation had its stable of champions, and the matter had not been settled to the satisfaction of anyone when the discoveries of [the scientist Paul] Ehrlich finally rendered the whole business irrelevant." (ibid.) In general, mercury was recognized as most effective in the early stages of the disease, while iodides were more effective in the later stages (Crissey and Parish, pp. 363-365). (The three-stage symptomatology -- "primary," "secondary," and "tertiary" -- was not codified until the publication of The Parasyphilitic Diseases by the dermatologist Alfred Fournier in 1894.) Both Vincent and Theo were treated with iodides in Paris between 1886 and 1888 (JLB 611, 5/20/1888), suggesting that both were suffering symptoms of late-stage syphilis at that time (see Chapter 28), and further supporting the conclusion that Vincent was being treated for an earlier stage of the disease in Antwerp (see Ch. 26, n. 199). Theo died of tertiary syphilis in 1890, only six months after Vincent's death. Wilkie offers direct evidence, albeit hearsay, that Vincent's doctor in Antwerp prescribed mercury treatments (Wilkie, pp. 146-147). (See Ch. 26, n. 199.)
According to Crissey and Parish, the method was revived in the 1850s and became "widely used in the last three decades of the century, although it never achieved the popularity of the oral [pill] and inunction [ointment rub] methods" (Crissey and Parish, p. 362). Crissey and Parish quote the instructions from one fumigation manual in 1866, showing that the basic procedure had hardly changed over the centuries: "The best time for taking the bath is just before going to bed. The circular groove, B, is to be filled one third full of boiling water, the alcohol lamp beneath lighted, and at the last moment about a scruple of calomel [mercurous chloride] to be deposited on the plate, A. The patient, stripped of his clothing and enveloped in one or more blankets drawn closely round the neck, sits upon a cane-bottomed chair with the lamp between his legs. In the course of five to ten minutes, profuse perspiration is induced; the calomel is wholly evaporated within fifteen minutes, when the lamp may be blown out, and the patient, after waiting five to ten minutes longer exposed to the moist vapor may retire to bed. I commonly advise, as recommended by Mr. Lee, that the use of a towel after the bath should be avoided, so that the thin layer of mercury deposited upon the surface of the body may remain and be farther absorbed." (ibid.) The special equipment and supplies required by this procedure would have been too expensive for Vincent to purchase, whereas they would have been available at a hospital like Stuyvenberg (see Ch. 26, n. 200).